The Quality of Assessment during Covid-19 Online Education in the Eyes of Students: Tishk International University Case

Authors

  • Hasan Gürbüz Tishk International University, Erbil, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v9i2p124

Keywords:

Measurement and Evaluation, Assessment, Covid 19, Online Education

Abstract

Measurement and evaluation are an indispensable elements of educational processes. As a result of this, how learning takes place is revealed, and the question of what changes should be made in the future depends on the result of this. The criteria for measurement and evaluation were designed in accordance with face-to-face education. In the conditions of online education in the Covid-19 process, some problems arose regarding measurement and evaluation. With the Likert scale questionnaire, we applied to our students, it was investigated how healthy the teacher assessments were during the term. In this study, it was revealed that the students had problems with measurement, evaluation, and teacher assessment in this period.

References

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86.

Assunção Flores, M., & Gago, M. (2020). Teacher education in times of COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: national, institutional and pedagogical responses. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 507-516.

Bilgin, R., Çelik, B., & Yıldız, Y. (2022). Economic Impact of Online Education during Covid 19 Process on Students: Tishk International University Case. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 2(2), 70-83.

Batubara, B. M. (2021). The Problems of the World of Education in the Middle of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 450-457.

Celik, B., Yildiz, Y., & Bilgin, R. (2022a). Perceptions and recommendations of foreign language teachers to prevent children violence and abuse: A case study in Tishk International University students in Erbil, Iraq. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 80(1), 82.

Celik, B., Yildiz, Y., & Bilgin, R. (2022b). The views of instructors in foreign language teaching with distance education model during the Covid 19 pandemic process: A study at Tishk International University in Erbil, Iraq. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 9(1), 148-176.

Celik, B., Darici, N., Yildiz, Y., & Yucedal, H. M. (2022c). Psychological Effects of Online Education during Covid 19 Process on Students: Tishk International University Case. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 2(2), 55-69.

Celik, B. (2021). Prospective Foreign Language Teacher Candidates’ Views on the Use of Communication Technologies in Foreign Language Education and Their Self-Efficacy Beliefs: Case of Erbil, Iraq. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 8(1), 59-72.

Celik, B. (2019a). Method Selection, Basic Methods and Different Orientations in Foreign Language Teaching. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 5(3), 237-245.

Celik, B. (2019b). Relationship between foreign language learning and exam stress with gender: A study on Tshik International University Preparatory School students, Iraq. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 5(3), 311-322.

Crooks, T. (2001, September). The validity of formative assessments. In British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Leeds (pp. 13-15).

Daniels, L. M., Goegan, L. D., & Parker, P. C. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 triggered changes to instruction and assessment on university students’ self-reported motivation, engagement and perceptions. Social Psychology of Education, 24(1), 299-318.

Daskan, A., & Yildiz, Y. (2020). Blended learning: A potential approach to promote learning outcomes. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 7(4), 103-108.

Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory into Practice, 55(2), 153-159.

Driessen, E., Van Tartwijk, J., Van Der Vleuten, C., & Wass, V. (2007). Portfolios in medical education: why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review. Medical Education, 41(12), 1224-1233.

Dutta, S., & Smita, M. K. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on tertiary education in Bangladesh: students’ perspectives. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8(09), 53.

Fisher, D. & Frey, N. (2007), Checking for understanding. Virginia. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Checking for understanding: Formative assessment techniques for your classroom (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publication.

Hancock, C. R. (1994). Alternative Assessment and Second Language Study: What and Why? ERIC Digest.

Henaku, E. A. (2020). COVID-19 online learning experience of college students: The case of Ghana. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Advanced Technology, 1(2), 54-62.

Henerson, M. E., Morris, L. L., & Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1987). How to measure attitudes. Sage.

Kizlik, B. (2012). Measurement, assessment, and evaluation in education. Retrieved October, 10, 2015.

Lester, P. E., Inman, D., & Bishop, L. K. (2014). Handbook of tests and measurement in education and the social sciences. Rowman & Littlefield.

McAlpine, M. (2002). Principles of assessment. Luton: CAA Centre, University of Luton.

Perera-Diltz, D. M., & Moe, J. L. (2014). Formative and summative assessment in online education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 7(1).

Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701.

Ruiz‐Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57-84.

Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 66-70.

Taras, M. (2009). Summative assessment: The missing link for formative assessment. Journal of further and Higher Education, 33(1), 57-69.

Tosun, M., & Yildiz, Y. (2015a). The role of moral values and systematic informing in aim-based education.

International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 2(2), 40-44.

Tosun, M., & Yildiz, Y. (2015b). Extracurricular Activities as Warm-Ups in Language Teaching. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 2(1), 62-64.

Ulker, V., & Yildiz, Y. (2021). The implementation of the authentic assessment in EFL classes in Erbil. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 8(2), 206-221.

Walsh, F. (2020). Loss and resilience in the time of COVID‐19: Meaning making, hope, and transcendence. Family Process, 59(3), 898-911.

Wilcha, R. J. (2020). Effectiveness of virtual medical teaching during the COVID-19 crisis: Systematic review. JMIR Medical Education, 6(2), e20963.

Zhang, C., Yan, X., & Wang, J. (2021). EFL teachers’ online assessment practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Changes and mediating factors. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 499-507.

Downloads

Published

10.09.2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Gürbüz, H. (2024). The Quality of Assessment during Covid-19 Online Education in the Eyes of Students: Tishk International University Case. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 9(2), 124-140. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v9i2p124

Similar Articles

1-10 of 484

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.