Letting Smartphones at Class Times: Does It Matter in Learning Process?

Authors

  • Saban Kara Department of Language, Faculty of Education, Tishk International University, Erbil, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v7i1p78

Keywords:

Academic Success, General English, Language Learning, Smartphone Addiction, Activities

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate the relation of learners’ addiction to smartphones and its effect on their academic success. The researcher dealt with two language learning groups of Foundation Course students (The students whose English is in the elementary level and study at the departments on a condition to be successful in English subject at the end of the academic year) who lagged behind others academically during the academic year and failed at the end of the first year of their study at Preparatory School (of a prominent university located in Erbil, Iraq). Therefore, they had to attend summer school which requires retaking a 6-week summer course in a total of 120 hours. The researcher himself gave the writing course to the two defined groups. Observing the formative and summative test results in the total achievement grade table, the researcher concluded that the idea of letting smartphones to use can pave way for fruitful results in learners’ comfort zone was a wrong perception. Without any hesitation, it hampered students’ language learning pace and there was a causal relationship between learners’ smartphone addiction at the lesson with their unsatisfactory total results.

References

Andersen, E. (2011). Cell Phones in School: Tools or Toys?(2009). Dostupný z WWW:< https://journalstar. com/lifestyles/article_b851282e-941c-11de-b6d1-001cc4c002e0. html.

Brainyquote.com, (2020). Retrieved from https://brainyquote.com/search_results?q=social+media

Celik, B., & Yıldız, Y. (2019). The role of foreign language culture on teaching the language and learner motivation. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 5(4), 150.

Glass, A. L., & Kang, M. (2019). Dividing attention in the classroom reduces exam performance. Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1489046

Issa, T., & Isaias, P. (2016). Internet factors influencing generations Y and Z in Australia and Portugal: A practical study. Information Processing and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.12.006

Kamenetz, A. (2019). The future of learning? Well, It’s Personal. NPR News.

Keengwe, J., Schnellert, G., & Jonas, D. (2014). Mobile phones in education: Challenges and opportunities for learning. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9235-7

Kuznekoff, J. H., & Titsworth, S. (2013). The Impact of Mobile Phone Usage on Student Learning. Communication Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2013.767917

Lenhart, A. (2010). Cell phones and American adults: They make just as many calls, but text less often than teens. Pew Research Center.

Miley, J. (2018). France has banned students from using smartphones and tablets at school. Interesting Engineering.

Moran, M., Seaman, J., & Tinti-Kane, H. (2012). Blogs, wikis, podcasts and Facebook: how today’s higher education faculty use social media. Pearson.

Questionnaire, S. (2011). ECAR national study of undergraduate students and information technology , 2011. Technology.

Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N., & Watkinson, A. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1087/20110306

Shawkat Mohammed, S., Suleyman, C., & Taylan, B. (2020). Burnout determinants and consequences among university lecturers. Revista Amazonia Investiga. https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2020.27.03.2

Tosun, M., & Yildiz, Y. (2015). The role of moral values and systematic informing in aim-based education. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 2(2), 40-44.

Yildiz, Y. (2015a). Time spent in target language-oriented extracurricular activities and foreign language students’ satisfaction. 5th International Research Conference on Education, Tbilisi, Georgia, 478-482.

Yildiz, Y. (2015b). Better education at Ishik University preparatory school with extracurricular activities. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(4), 158-161.

Yildiz, Y. (2017a). Components of commitment to the teaching profession. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v4i2sip115

Yildiz, Y. (2017b). Extracurricular Activities in the Steps of Aim-Based Education. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v4i2sip129

Yildiz, Y. (2019). EFL learners’ needs in preparatory schools and supplementary techniques to improve their language proficiency.

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i1/5460

Yildiz, Y. (2020a). Task-Based language teaching: An approach in the spotlight to propel language learning forward. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies. https:// doi: 10.23918/ijsses.v7i1p72

Yildiz, Y. (2020b). Reading habit and its role on students’ academic success at language preparatory school: A Research on Tishk International University preparatory school students. Amazonia Investiga, 9(27), 189-194.

Downloads

Published

01.03.2020

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kara, S. (2020). Letting Smartphones at Class Times: Does It Matter in Learning Process?. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 7(1), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v7i1p78

Similar Articles

1-10 of 466

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.