Towards Interdisciplinarity in the Arab World: The Need for Interdisciplinary Studies in the Nascent Saudi Universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v5i3p95Keywords:
Interdisciplinary Studies/Research, New Research Perspectives, Multidisciplinarity, Trans-Disciplinarity, Cross-Disciplinarity, Intra-Disciplinarity, Pluri-Disciplinarity, Post-Disciplinarity, Arabic Universities, Nascent UniversitiesAbstract
Interdisciplinary studies/sciences are currently flourishing in numberless Western universities. There are currently, a variety of interdisciplinary research centres, programmes and departments, in many Western universities (sometimes even colleges as in the case of University of British Columbia in Canada). International conferences and special magazines are presently being dedicated to these issues and trends all over the world. By way of contrast, the Arab world, with the exception of very few cases, this tendency is yet to be known, let alone be introduced. It would, therefore, be immensely imperative for the nascent universities, Majmaah university included, to introduce interdisciplinary studies in their undergraduate/postgraduate programmes/plans. It is here that the nascent universities in the Arab world can markedly excel by exploring new horizons, as well as by probing a largely virgin space in education and research. In this way, they can get more competitive in an increasingly tough and pressing labour market, hence can considerably contribute to the knowledge economy of today’s time. This paper argues for the need to incorporate interdisciplinary studies/sciences and interdisciplinarity, into the programmes of Arab universities, in general, and the newly established Saudi ones, to be more specific (Majmaah). Data were collected via an array of mixed methods. Chiefly, group discussions and interviews with top managers, high-ranking administrators, educationalists, scholars and pundits from all walks of academia were exploited in the study. Analysis primarily drew on an integration of both qualitative and quantative methods (noting that much of the data required in this study is of qualitative nature, and that much more recent social/human sciences research has importantly disclosed a special inclination towards qualitative data gathering and analysis). Results largely suggest not only the need for adopting and introducing interdisciplinary studies and interdisciplinarity in Majma’ah university, but also, generalizably in the rest of the other newly-established universities/colleges and Arab academia, at large.
References
Al-Zahrani, A. (2010). The Lack of Compatibility between the Requirements of the Saudi Labour Market and the Saudi Higher Education Outcomes: Reality, Causes and Solutions. unpublished PhD thesis, Um al-Qura university, KSA.
Ausburg, T. (2006). Becoming interdisciplinary: An introduction to interdisciplinary studies. USA: Kendall Hunt.
Axinn, W., & Pearce, L. (2007). Mixed methods data collection strategies (2nd edn.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dale, A. (2008). Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries. In: NCRM Research Methods Festival 2008, 30th June – 3rd July 2008, St Catherine’s College, Oxford. (Unpublished).
Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and Phenomena and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs, trans. By Allison, David, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology, trans. by, G., Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press
Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference, trans. Bass, A. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ethan, K. (2008). Interdisciplinary Studies at the Crossroads. Liberal Education, 94 (1), 6-11.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Feyerabend, P. (1962). Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (ed.), Scientific explanation, space, and time, (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume III), Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press (pp. 28–97).
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. trans. By Sheridan, Alan., Vintage Books , (1st edn. 1975).
Foucault, M. (2002). Archaeology of knowledge: The discourse of language. trans. By Smith Sheridan. London: Routledge (1st. edn. 1969).
Foucault, M. (2006). History of madness. trans. By Murphy, J. London: Routledge (1st edn. 1961).
Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and Time (trans. By Stambaugh, J. Albany: State University of New York University Press. (first trans. By Macquarie, J. and Robinson, E. 1962).
Hutcheon, D. (1997). An Interdisciplinary Approach to Social Science Research. A paper presented at the Conference on Interdisciplinary Studies at the University of British Columbia, Canada.
Hutcheon, L. (2004). A poetics of postmodernism: history, theory, fiction. padstow, (11th edn.). Cornwall: TJ International Ltd.
Jacobs, J. (2013). In defense of disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and specialization in the research university. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jensenius, R. (2012). Disciplinarities: intra, cross, multi, inter, trans, https://arj.no, retrieved on 12 March.
Klein, T. J. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory and practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Klein. T. J. (1990). Interdisciplinary Resources: A Bibliographical Reflection. Issues in Integrative Studies, 8, 35- 67.
Klein, T. J. (2002). Mapping interdisciplinarity studies. Washington D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Klein, T. J. (2005). Humanities, culture and interdisciplinarity: The changing American academy. Albany: State university of New York Press.
Klein, T. J. (2010). Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures. Sanfrancisco: Jossy Bass and the Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lattuca, L. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. USA: Vanderbilt University Press.
Lele, S., & Norgaard, R. (2005). Practicing interdisciplinarity. BioScience, 55 (11), 967.
Lipton, M. (1970). Interdisciplinarity studies in less developed countries. Journal of Development Studies, 7 (1), 5-18.
Lise, M. (2004). The Cartesian Distinction between Thinking Things and Objects makes no Sense”(unpublished).
Moran, J. (2010). Interdisciplinarity. London: Taylor and Francis (2nd edn.).
Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity (trans. By Voss, Karen-Claire). USA: SUNY Press/Albany: State University of New York Press.
Nicolescu, B. (n.d.). Transdisciplinarity: Past, Present and Future. www.movingworldviews.net/Downloads/Papers/Nicolescu.pdf
Oberheim, E., & Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2012). The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/incommensurability/>.
https://units.miamioh.edu/aisorg/ Association for Interdisciplinary Studies, Michigan university, 36th Annual AIS Conference, Oct. 15-19, 2014.
https://inter-eng.upm.ro/2014, The International 8th Conference on Interdisciplinarity in Engineering, Oct. 2014 Romania./
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies
International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies applies the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic Licence (CC BY-NC 2.0)
