Corrective Feedback that “O” Level Students Get from their English Composition Teachers in Bulawayo: A Qualitative Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v5i3p142Keywords:
Zimbabwe, Corrective Feedback, Composition Wring, “O” LevelAbstract
Teacher’s corrective feedback is essential in composition writing for students. This qualitative study used a convenient sample of seven “O” Level (form four) English Language students from one conveniently chosen school in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. Researchers collected data through interviews of the seven informants and composition exercise books content analysis for all the students in the form four classes of the chosen school. The collected data was organized, coded and analyzed according to the themes that emerged. Findings showed that on Feed Up, students got adequate teachers’ explanations on composition goals, expectations, instructions and guidelines. The teachers also prepared students to write compositions psychologically. On Feed Back, students got corrected work, meaningful comments and marks from their teachers. Teachers thoroughly marked students’ composition books focusing on English “O” Level syllabus requirements. In their marking, teachers used correction codes to indicate errors, however, some students could not understand the code meanings since they were not given to them. On Feed Forward, composition teachers used the information they got from the students’ performance for planning purposes, for instance, due to students’ low performance, teachers thoroughly marked students’ compositions; they made students’ consultation time available, giving weekend and holiday composition exercises as well as encouraging students to write corrections. However, the teacher did not emphasize other aspects, for instance, the total composition marks as part of composition expectations and the teacher hardly conversed with the students. There was also a problem of insufficient feedback resources from their teachers. The study recommended that sufficient feedback resources should be supplied to the composition teachers and students. All composition teachers should explain composition mark allocation to the students whenever they give them composition work. Again, whenever composition teachers use correction codes, elaborations should accompany those codes.
References
Al-Jarrah, R. S. (2016). A suggested model of corrective feedback provision. Science Direct, 3, 98-107. Retrieved from https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039016300248
Alvira, R. (2016). The impact of oral and written feedback on EFL writers with the use of screencasts. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development. 18(2), 79-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n2.53397
Brown, D. (2012). The written corrective feedback debate: Next steps for classroom teachers and practitioners. TESOL Quarterly, A Journal for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages and of Standard English as a Second Dialect, 46(4), 861-867. Retrieved from https://tirfonline.org
Bruno, I., & Santos, L. (2010). Written comments as a form of feedback. Studies in educational evaluation. ERIC, 36 (3), 111-120. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ916979
Cagla, A. (2016). Contrasting perceptions of students and teachers: Written Corrective Feedback. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12 (2), 166-182. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1117969
Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. Retrieved from https://routledge.com/Excellence-in-University-Assessment-Learning-from-award-winning-practice/Carless/p/book/9781138824553
Catapano, J. (2017). Teaching strategies: The essentials of giving feedback. Retrieved from https://teachhub.com/teaching-strategies-essentials-giving-feedback
Chen, S., Nassaji, H., & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: a case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(5). Retrieved from https://sfleducation.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40862-016-0010-y
Chen, Y. (2013). Master’s and Doctoral theses on Second Language writing: A survey of the emerging voices in China. (Masters theses). Paper 66. Retrieved from https://scholar orks.gvsu.edu/theses
Crimmins, G., Nash, G., Oprescu, F., Liebergreen, M., Turley, J., Bond, R., & Dayton, J. (2016). A written, reflective and dialogic strategy for assessment feedback that can enhance student/teacher relationships. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41 (1), 141-153. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085838
Dreher, A. (2016). Giving positive and corrective feedback. Retrieved from https://mentorleadershipteam.com/articles/giving-positive-and-corrective-feedback
Elliott, V., Baird, J., Hopfenbeck, T., Ingram, J., Thompson, I., Usher, N., . . . Zantout, M. (2016). A marked improvement? Retrieved from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/
Faqeih, H. (2015). Learners’ attitudes towards corrective feedback. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 664-671. Retrieved from https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815035727
Ferdouse, F. (2011). Learning from mistakes: Using correction code to improve student’s writing skill in English composition class. Retrieved from https://banglajol.info/index.php/SJE/article/download/14463/10271
Gwata, D. (2017). Impact of teaching-learning resources in English composition writing at Ordinary Level: The case study of Glen Norah High 1, Queen Elizabeth and Southlea secondary schools in Harare. (Unpublished project). Solusi University.
Han, J., & Yin, H. (2016). Teacher motivation: Definition, research development and implications for teachers. Teacher education & development | review article. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819
Hattie, J., & Timperly, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Retrieved from Growthmindseteaz.org
Hattie, J. A. C., & Yates, G.C.R. (2014). Using feedback to promote learning. Retrieved from https://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/
https://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article
Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015).The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis. The Modern Language Journal , 99 (1). Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/modl.12189/pdf
Katrin, H., & Johannes, H. (2013). Understanding and using feedback: A review of empirical studies concerning feedback from external evaluations to teachers. Educational Research Review, 9, 174-190. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ999457
Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2012). Corrective feedback in second language writing. Retrieved from https://tru.ca/__…/Khaled_Karim_and_Hossein_Nassaji_-_
Lee, I. (2011). Working smarter, not working harder: Revisiting teacher feedback in the L2 writing classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 67 (3), 377-399. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov
McCarthy, J. (2016). Timely Feedback: Now or Never. Retrieved from https://edutopia.org/blog/timely-feedback-now-or-never-john-mccarthy
Mee, S. H. (2016). Four different types of writing styles: Expository, descriptive, persuasive, and narrative. Retrieved from https://letterpile.com/writing/Four-Types-of-Writing
Mukeredzi, T. G. (2016). The nature of professional learning needs of rural Secondary school teachers. Voices of professionally unqualified teachers in rural Zimbabwe. Sage Journals. 6 (2). Retrieved from htp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244016643142
Nabiryo, N. R. (2011). Factors influencing students’ writing skills in English: A case study of selected secondary schools in Rubaga Division, Kampala District. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10570/2621
Nielsen, D. (2015). The impact of formative feedback on student motivation to write in eighth grade English courses. (Thesis). Paper 440. Retrieved from https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu
Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2017). Writing with 21st century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genres, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 52-60. Retrieved from https://researchgate.net/publication/311669829_ESL_Learners’_Writing_Skills_Problems_Factors_and_Suggestions
Oyedele, V., & Chikwature, W. (2016). English composition writing skills at Ordinary Level and its effect on students’ performance in three day secondary schools in Mutare District. European Journal of English Language, Linguistics and Literature, 3 (1). Retrieved from www.idpublications.org
Parr, J. M., & Timperley, H. S. (2010). Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress. ERIC, 15 (2), 68-85. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ890803
Peary, A., & Hunley, T. C. (2015). Creative writing and process pedagogy. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/chapter/1586899
Reynolds, L. (2013). 20 ways to provide effective feedback for learning. Retrieved fromhttps://teachthought.com/technology/20-ways-to-provide-effective-feedback-for-learning/
Saaris, N. (2016). Effective feedback for deeper learning. Retrieved from https://activelylearn.com/
Shintani, E. 2014). Corrective feedback. https://outspokenela.files.wordpress.com
Three-mob.com. (2013). Zimbabwe ‘O’ Level results: Pass rate down. Retrieved from https://3-mob.com/featured/zimbabwe-o-level-results-pass-rate/#.WgQKrXZLfIU
Wiggins, G. (2014). What feedback is and is not. Retrieved from https://grantwiggins.wordpress.com/2014/04/15/what-feedback-is-and-isnt/
Y1Feedback (2016). Technology-enabled feedback in the first year: A synthesis of the literature. Retrieved from https://teachingandlearning.ie/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/
ZGCE “O” Level English Syllabus (1122) – ZIMSEC. June/November 2013 – 2017 retrieved from https://zimsec.co.zw/O_SYLLABUS/O_ENGLISH.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies
International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies applies the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic Licence (CC BY-NC 2.0)
