Effects of Cooperative Learning Method Type Stad, Language Aptitude, and Intelligence on the Achievement English Hotel at Medan Tourism Academy
Keywords:
Cooperative Learning Method, Intelligence, Language Aptitude, AchievementAbstract
: STAD cooperative learning method which is considered effective in achieving the goal of learning the English language, especially for students majoring in Tourism Academy who are required to master English for Specific Purposes (ESP) in accordance with their needs. This study uses factorial design 2x3x3 version of the non-equivalent control group design with ANOVA 3 Ways. The subjects were students MDK III / 5 A and B courses MDK III.5 Rooms Division department Hospitality Academy Year 2015/2016. The samples are saturated samples. Data were collected through a pretest, posttest, and instrument of Language Aptitude and Intelligence parametric statistics analyzed by parametric statistics with significance level of 0.05%. The results showed that: (1) there are differences between method STAD cooperative learning and expository on Hospitality English achievement, (2) there are differences between the students who have high language aptitude and low language aptitude on English achievement, (3) there are differences between students who have high language aptitude and medium on Hospitality English achievement, (4) there are differences between students who have the medium language aptitude and low language aptitude on Hospitality English achievement, (5) there are differences between students who have high intelligence and low intelligence\ on Hospitality English achievement, (6) there are no differences between who have high intelligence and medium intelligence on Hospitality English achievement, (7) there are differences between students who have the medium intelligence and low intelligence on Hospitality English achievement, (8) there is no interaction between the learning method and language aptitude on Hospitality English achievement, (9) there is an interaction between the learning method and the intelligence on Hospitality English achievement, (10) there is no interaction between intelligence and language aptitude on Hospitality English achievement. (11) there is no interaction between teaching methods, language aptitude, and intelligence on Hospitality English achievement, (12) there is an interaction between STAD cooperative learning methods and expository on Hospitality English achievement.
References
Cresswell, W. (2010) . Research Design, Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Pustaka Pelaja:
Celebon Timur Yogyakarta.
Dalyono. M. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Dhieni, N. (2008). Metode Pengembangan Bahasa. Jakarta.Universitas Terbuka.
Dudley-Evans, T. (2001). .English for Specific Purposes in the Cambridge Guide to TESOL. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Dudley-Evans, T & St John, M. (1998). Development in ESP: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence Reformed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York:
Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies
ISSN 2409-1294 (Print), December 2016, Vol.3, No.2
139 IJSSES
Graddol, D. (1997). The Future of English. London: The British Council.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A learning-Centered Approach.
Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Jasmine, J. (2007). Panduan Praktis Mengajar Berbasis Multiple Intelligences, Bandung: Nuansa.
Johnson, D.W.,& Johnson, R.T. (2002). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Journal of
Research in Education. 12 (1), 5 – 24
Johnson, D.W.,& Johnson, R.T. (1991). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and
Individualistic Learning (3rd edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Killen, R. (1998). Effective teaching strategies: Lessons from Research and Practice. 2nd edition.
Wentworth Falls, Australia: Social Science Press.
Mukhadis, A. (2003). Pengorganisasian Isi Pembelajaran Tipe Prosedural, Kajian Empirik pada Latar
Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Rumpun Teknologi. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang (UM
Press).
Munby, J. (1978). Specifying Communicative Needs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (1990). English for Specific Purposes. Oxford. Pergamon Press.
Sagala, S. (2010). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice. Englewoods Cliff, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Strevens, P. (1988). ESP after Twenty Years: A Re-apraisal in M-Tickoo. ESP: State of Art. Singapore:
SEAMEO Regional Centre.
Woodworth, R. S. (1948). Contemporary Schools of Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Ronald Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies
International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies applies the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic Licence (CC BY-NC 2.0)
