Students’ Perception on Lecturer Evaluation in Higher Education

Authors

  • Karwan Hushyar Sherwani Business and Management Department, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Tishk International University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
  • Uma Shankar Singh Business and Management Department, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Tishk International University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Keywords:

Higher Education, Perception, Feedback, Lecturer, Student Evaluation

Abstract

The research is descriptive in nature and is based on the concept of measuring the lecturer‘s performance in universities and the efficiency of the instrument provided by ministry of higher education. The research problem cited as the need of understanding student‘s psychology and perception on the lecturer evaluation system in higher education. For this purpose research objectives taken are, to measure the acceptance of variables getting measured for the lecturer evaluation by the instrument of higher education and to know students perception on lecturer in higher. For the purpose of concept building secondary literature reviewed and primary data is the base for outcome of this research. A self-explained instrument is created taking 21 items with 4 demographic variables. A sample size of 157 respondents considered from different universities and grades in Kurdistan. The analysis is based on reliability testing, statistical T-Test and One Way ANOVA using SPSS 20. All 21 variables are getting accepted with very significant values for acceptance shows respondent‘s opinion significantly varies on all 21 variables using statistical T-test. One Way ANOVA test is performed taking 84 sets prepared shows 44 sets having accepted though 40 sets rejected. At the conclusion ten variable for the performance evaluation for the lecturer is strongly recommended for the mutual development and to contribute in development process of society.

References

Bianchini, S., Lissoni, F., & Pezzoni, M. (2013). Instructor characteristics and students' evaluation of

teaching effectiviness: evidence from an italian engineering school. European Journal of

Engineering Educaion, 38(1), 38-57.

Boyd, D., & Bloxham, S. (2009). Editorial: Assessment Special Edition. Practitioner Research in

Higher Education, 3(1), 1-2.

Chen, Y., & Hoshower, L. B. (2003). Student Evaluation of Teaching efectiviness: an assessment of

student perception and motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education: Carfax

Publishing, 28(1), 71-88.

Cohen, J. (1992). Statistics a power primer. Psycholog Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.

Darwin, S. (2010). Exploring critical conceptions of student-led evaluation in Ausralian higher

Education. Research and Development in Higher Education: Reshaping Higher Education (pp.

203-212). Melbourne: Higher Education Research and Development society of Australasia.

David, H. A., & Gunnink, J. (1997). The paired t Test Under Artificial Pairing. The American

Statistician, 51(1), 9-12.

Diaz, H. M., & Ragan, J. F. (2010). Do student evaluation of teaching depend on the distrubution of

expected grade? Education Economics: Taylor and Francis Group, 18(3), 317-330.

Dilts, D. A., Haber, L. J., & Bialik, D. (1994). Assessing what professors Do: An Introduction to

Academic Performance Appraisal in Higher Education (1st ed.). Westport: GreenWood Press.

Dodeen, H. (2013). Validity, Reliability, and Potential Bias of Short Forms of Student's Evaluation of

Teaching: The Case of UAE University. Educational Assessment: Taylor & Francis Group, 235-

250.

Duncan, N. (2007). Feed-forward: improving students‘ use of tutors‘ comments. Assessment and

evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 271-283.

Elander, J. (2003). Student assessment from a psychological perspective, Psychology. Learning and

Teaching , 3(2), 114-121.

Farreras, I. G., & Boyle, R. W. (2012). The effect of faculty self-promotion on student evaluations of

teaching. College Student Journal, 46(2), 314-322.

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students‘ learning.

Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3-31.

Heine, P., & Maddox, N. (2009). Student perceptions of the Faculty course evaluation process: an

exploratory study of gender and class differences. Research in Higher Education Journal, 3, 1-10.

International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies

ISSN 2409-1294 (Print), September 2015, Vol.2, No.1

61 IJSSES

Hejase, A. J., Al Kaakour, R. S., Halawi, L. A., & Hejase, H. J. (2013). Students' Perception of Student

evaluation of teaching (SET) Process. International J. Soc. Sci. and Education, 3(3), 565-575.

Kogan, L. R., Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., & Hellyer, P. W. (2010). Student evaluations of teaching:

Perceptions of facult based on gender, position, and rank. Teaching in Higher Educaion, 15(6),

623-636.

Lindahl, M. W., & Unger, M. L. (2010). Cruelty in Student Teaching Evaluations. Taylor & Francis

Group Routledge, 57, 71-76.

Machingambi, S., & Wadesango, N. (2011). University Lecurers' Perceptions on Students Evaluation of

Their Instructional Practices. Anthropologist, 167-174.

McDowell, L., Sambell, K., & Davison, G. (2009). Assessment for learning: a brief history and review

of terminology, Improving student learning through the curriculum. 16th International Improving

Learning Symposium, (p. 64). Oxford.

MHESR. (2009). A Road map to Quality: Reforming the sytem of Higher Education and Scientifc

Research in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. Erbil: Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific

Research, Kurdistan Regional Government.

O'Brien, R. G. (1981). A Simple Test for Variance Effecs in Experimenal Designs. Psychological

Bulletin, 89, 570-574.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). A call for qualitative power analyses: Considerations in

qualitative research. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 41(1): 105-121.

Palmer, S. (2012). The performance of a student evaluation of teaching system. Assessment and

Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), 975-985.

Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O'Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: all that effort, but what is the

effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education: Routledge, 35(3), 277-289.

Rantanen, P. (2013). The number of feedbacks needed for reliable evaluation. A multilevel analysis of

the reliability, stability, and generalisability of students' evaluation of teaching. Assessment and

Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(2), 224-239.

Rasheed, M. I., Aslam, H. D., Yousaf, S., & Noor, A. (2011). A critical analysis of performance

appraisal system for teachers in public sector universities of Pakistan: A case study of the Islamia

University of Bahawalpur. African Journal of Business Management, 5(9), 3735-1744.

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional

Science, 18(2), 119-144.

Sawilowsky, S. S., & Clifford, B. R. (1992). A More Realistic Look at the Robustness and Type II Error

Properties of the t Test to Departures From Population Normality. Psycholoical Bulletin III, 2,

352-360.

Stehle, S., Spinath, B., & Kadmon, M. (2012). Measuring Teaching Effectiviness: Correspondence

Between Student's Evaluations of Teaching and Different Measures of Student Learning.

Research in Higher Education: Springer, 53(8), 888-904.

Stein, S. J., Spiller, D., Terry, S., Harris, T., Deaker, L., & Kennedy, J. (2013). Tertiary teachers and

student evaluation: never the twain shall meet? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,

28(7), 892-904.

Sulong, M. S. (2014). Lecturers' perception on teaching evaluation: selection of research instruments.

The Online Journal of Quality in Higher Education, 1(2), 36-44.

Wachtel, H. K. (1998). Student Evaluation of College Teaching Effectiveness: A Breif Review.

Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 191-211.

Downloads

Published

01.09.2015

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sherwani, K. H., & Singh, U. S. (2015). Students’ Perception on Lecturer Evaluation in Higher Education. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 2(1), 49-61. https://ijsses.tiu.edu.iq/index.php/ijsses/article/view/634

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1-10 of 524

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.