Enhancing Academic Performance Through Effective Classroom Management and Output Distribution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v10i3p424Keywords:
Teachers Behavior, Classroom Environment, Class Discussion, Performance Task Distribution, Students AchievementsAbstract
This study investigates the relationship between classroom management, distribution of output, and students’ academic performance. Classroom management is crucial for creating a positive learning environment and involves establishing clear rules, routines, and time management strategies. Effective classroom management reduces disruptive behavior, facilitates social and emotional development, and promotes positive peer interactions. However, there is a lack of significant relationship between classroom management behaviors and academic performance, contrary to previous literature. The distribution of output, such as projects and assignments, plays a significant role in student learning and success. Effective teachers use various strategies, including leveraging technology, providing timely feedback, promoting collaboration, distributing tasks evenly, and offering support and guidance throughout the project process. Well-designed tasks and teacher support enhance student engagement, skill development, and overall academic performance. Students perceive themselves as actively engaged in their studies, completing assignments on time, and applying learned skills. However, there is room for improvement in exam performance. Regular attendance, timely assignment completion, and application of skills positively impact academic performance. Factors beyond classroom management play a more substantial role in student outcomes, highlighting the complexity of the classroom environment. The study aims to provide recommendations for improving instructional practices and student outcomes based on the findings. Optimizing classroom seating arrangements, emphasizing meaningful and relevant tasks, providing additional support for exam performance, and conducting further research on the relationship between classroom management and academic performance are recommended. By implementing these recommendations, educators can create a positive learning environment, enhance student engagement, and improve academic achievement. The ultimate goal is to support evidence-based decision-making and promote positive educational outcomes.
References
Adeyemo, S. A. (2012). The relationship between effective classroom management and students’ academic achievement. European Journal of educational studies, 4(3), 367-381.
Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2013). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and environment, 59, 678-689.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The clearing house, 83(2), 39-43.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Granada Learning.
Boss, S., & Krauss, J. (2022). Reinventing project-based learning: Your field guide to real-world projects in the digital age. International Society for Technology in Education.
Brophy, J. (2006). History of research on classroom management. Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues, 17-43.
Cordova, M. S., Maria, J. M. S., & Santos, J. V. L. (2022). Factors Affecting Academic Performance and Motivation among Holy Cross College Sta. Rosa Grade 12 Students. EDUCATIO: Journal of Education, 7(3), 152-162.
Corno, L., & Xu, J. (2004). Homework as the job of childhood. Theory into practice, 43(3), 227-233.
Cothran, D. J., & Ennis, C. D. (1997). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of conflict and power. Teaching and teacher education, 13(5), 541-553.
Dicke, T., Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Kunter, M., Schmeck, A., & Leutner, D. (2014). Self-efficacy in classroom management, classroom disturbances, and emotional exhaustion: A moderated mediation analysis of teacher candidates. Journal of educational psychology, 106(2), 569.
Emmer, E. T., & Stough, L. M. (2001). Classroom management: A critical part of educational psychology, with implications for teacher education. Educational psychologist, 36(2), 103-112.
Ennis, C. D. (1995). Teachers’ responses to noncompliant students: The realities and consequences of a negotiated curriculum. Teaching and teacher education, 11(5), 445-460.
Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. Routledge.
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter?. Handbook of research on student engagement, 97-131.
Garrote, R., & Pettersson, T. (2007). Lecturers’ attitudes about the use of learning management systems in engineering education: A Swedish case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(3).
Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychological science, 23(8), 899-906.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates. (2008). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. John Wiley & Sons.
Kuo, Y. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2019). Teacher support and student engagement in project-based learning: The mediating role of perceived competence. Learning Environments Research, 22(3), 359-376.
Kyriacou, C. (2018). Essential teaching skills (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J. R., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project-based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. ASCD.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2019). Practical Research: Planning and Design (12th ed.). Pearson.
LlenadaSantos, J. V. (2022). Comparative analysis of mobile applications for its integration in college mathematics subjects. EDUCATIO: Journal of Education, 6(4), 324-345.
LePage, P., Darling-Hammond, L., Akar, H., Gutierrez, S., Jenkins, D., Reinhorn
Lindstrom, L., Doren, B., & Miesse, C. (2012). Promoting positive peer social interactions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(6), 16-26.
Marzano, R. J. (2017). The new art and science of teaching. Solution Tree Press.
Marzano, R. J., & Marzano, J. S. (2003). The key to classroom management. Educational Leadership, 61(1), 6-13.
Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S., & Pickering, D. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research-based strategies for every teacher. ASCD.
Ozudogru, M., & Akkus Cakir, N. (2021). Computer Supported Asynchronous Online Discussions in Teacher Education. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 8(4), 2598-2617.
Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Marsh, H. W., Murayama, K., & Goetz, T. (2017). Achievement emotions and academic performance: Longitudinal models of reciprocal effects. Child Development, 88(5), 1653-1670.
Perez, A. S. B., & Santos, J. V. L. (2022). Alignment of the Holy Cross College STA. Rosa Student’s Program with their Interest and Skills. EDUCATIO: Journal of Education, 7(1), 25-32.
Reddy, L. A., Rhodes, J. E., & Mulhall, P. (2003). The influence of teacher support on student adjustment in the middle school years: A latent growth curve study. Development and Psychopathology, 15(1), 119-138.
Reeve, D., Bolt, D., & Canning, N. (2016). What do we know about students’ experience of project-based learning? A case for a new perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 840-854.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529.
Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
Santos, J. V. L. (2021). Contingency Theories of Leadership: Effectiveness of the College Instructor’s Leadership Style. EDUCATIO: Journal of Education, 6(2), 107-113.
Santos, J. V. L. (2022). Development of Cheating Dilemma as a Thought Experiment in Assessing the Student’s Ethical Decision Making. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 2(1), 40-56.
Shaftel, J., & Shaftel, T. L. (2005). The influence of effective teaching in accounting on student attitudes, behavior, and performance. Issues in Accounting Education, 20(3), 231-246.
Smith, T. M. (2019). Teacher-student interactions in education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
Spencer, V. G. (2020). Classroom management: A Proactive Approach for Teachers. Routledge.
Teo, T., & Lee, C. B. (2016). Examining the impact of teacher feedback on student learning in project-based learning environments. Instructional Science, 44(3), 247-262.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.
Thum, Y. M. (2003). Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(4), 305-307.
Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1997). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 363-386.
Wang, M. T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633-662.
Zeidner, M. (2014). Test anxiety in educational contexts: Concepts, findings, and future directions. In H. F. O
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies
International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies applies the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic Licence (CC BY-NC 2.0)
