Assessment Practices to Support Communication in Biology: Understanding Student Behaviour
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v12i2p1Keywords:
Science Communication, Assessment, Learning Strategies, Higher EducationAbstract
Undergraduate science courses typically lack the variety of assessment tasks necessary to facilitate the development of the range of communication types needed in the workplace, such as writing reports and presenting findings. Models of implementing change are scarce, and there is little in the literature to indicate how to teach communication in a scientific context. To scaffold and implement change in assessment, it is helpful to understand how students use the learning materials provided. This research indicates that there is little change in the way students approach assessment tasks throughout an undergraduate degree program. In contrast, postgraduate students use significantly different methods in their learning, employing a wider range of strategies to develop writing skills. Understanding how this difference in learning strategies develops provides an opportunity to address the gap in learning and support a wider range of communication skills for graduates. This study contributes to our understanding of how students develop communication skills by proposing new assessment models and suggesting interventions to enhance communication skills in both undergraduate and postgraduate science education. Using a mixed-methods approach, key findings were derived from surveys and analysis of assessment performance, highlighting the distinct learning strategies between undergraduate and postgraduate students.
References
Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational researcher, 32(8), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032008010
Alexander, P. A., Sperl, C. T., Buehl, M. M., Fives, H., & Chiu, S. (2004). Modeling domain learning: Profiles from the field of special education. Journal of educational psychology, 96(3), 545. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.545
Anderson, L. W., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing : a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed.). Longman.
Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-011-9417-8
Brabazon, T. (2016). Digital dieting: From information obesity to intellectual fitness. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315577159
Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Chapter 3: Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of research in education, 24(1), 61-100. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X024001061
Campbell, E., & Storch, N. (2011). The changing face of motivation: A study of second language learners’ motivation over time. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 34(2), 166-192. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.34.2.03cam
Carrigan, M. (2017). An Interview with Patricia Leavy About Research Design in Contemporary Times. The Sociological Imagination.
Dannels, D. P. (2001). Time to speak up: A theoretical framework of situated pedagogy and practice for communication across the curriculum. Communication education, 50(2), 144-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520109379240
Dinsmore, D. L., & Zoellner, B. P. (2018). The relation between cognitive and metacognitive strategic processing during a science simulation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12177
Donnison, S., & Penn-Edwards, S. (2012). Focusing on first year assessment: Surface or deep approaches to learning? International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 3(2), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v3i2.127
Emerson, L. (2012). The life cycle of the scientific writer: An investigation of the senior academic scientist as writer in Australasian universities. In International advances in writing research: Cultures, places and measures (pp. 355-372). https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2012.0452.2.20
Emerson, L. (2017a). The forgotten tribe: Scientists as writers. The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2016.0759
Emerson, L. (2017b). Writing science: Implications for the classroom. Asian Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 23-36.
Ferguson, M., Head, B., Cherney, A., & Boreham, P. (2014). Australian survey indicates policy-makers still have major reservations about assigning priority to academic research. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.
Greenleaf, C., & Valencia, S. (2017). Missing in action: Learning from texts in subject-matter classrooms. Adolescent literacies: A handbook of practice-based research, 235-256.
Harris, A. (2016). Integrating written communication skills: working towards a whole of course approach. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(3), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1138456
Jetton, T. L., & Alexander, P. A. (1997). Instructional importance: What teachers value and what students learn. Reading research quarterly, 32(3), 290-308. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.32.3.4
Lin, T.-C., Hsu, Y.-S., Lin, S.-S., Changlai, M.-L., Yang, K.-Y., & Lai, T.-L. (2012). A review of empirical evidence on scaffolding for science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9322-z
Lipnevich, A. A., Panadero, E., & Calistro, T. (2023). Unraveling the effects of rubrics and exemplars on student writing performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 29(1), 136. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000434
Luca, E. J. (2019). Reflections on an embedded librarianship approach: The challenge of developing disciplinary expertise in a new subject area. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 68(1), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2019.1573631
McCarty, R. (2019). Complicating the relationship between disciplinary expertise and writing development. In developing writers in higher education (pp. 113). University of Michigan Press.
Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Kuchel, L. (2015). Teaching scientists to communicate: Evidence-based assessment for undergraduate science education. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1613-1638. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045959
Middlebrooks, C. D. (2018). Encoding and Retrieval Influences on the Strategic Study of Important Information University of California, Los Angeles.
Palmer, S., Campbell, M., Johnson, E., & West, J. (2018). Occupational outcomes for Bachelor of Science graduates in Australia and implications for undergraduate science curricula. Research in Science Education, 48, 989-1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9595-x
Petersen, M. R. (2022). Strategies to scaffold students’ inquiry learning in science. Science Education International, 33(3), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i3.1
Platow, M. J., Mavor, K. I., & Grace, D. M. (2013). On the role of discipline-related self-concept in deep and surface approaches to learning among university students. Instructional Science, 41, 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9227-4
Rowland, S., & Kuchel, L. (2023). Teaching Science Students to Communicate: A Practical Guide. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91628-2
Stevens, S., Mills, R., & Kuchel, L. (2019). Teaching communication in general science degrees: Highly valued but missing the mark. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1578861
Tury, S., Robinson, L., & Bawden, D. (2015). The information seeking behaviour of distance learners: A case study of the University of London international programmes. The journal of academic librarianship, 41(3), 312-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.008
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2015). The effects of scaffolding in the classroom: support contingency and student independent working time in relation to student achievement, task effort and appreciation of support. Instructional Science, 43, 615-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9351-z
Wale, B. D., & Bogale, Y. N. (2021). Using inquiry-based writing instruction to develop students’ academic writing skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00108-9
Wang, X., & Kennedy-Phillips, L. (2013). Focusing on the sophomores: Characteristics associated with the academic and social involvement of second-year college students. Journal of College Student Development, 54(5), 541-548. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0072
Yancey, K., Robertson, L., & Taczak, K. (2014). Writing across contexts: Transfer, composition, and sites of writing. University Press of Colorado.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational StudiesInternational Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies applies the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic Licence (CC BY-NC 2.0)