Authors: Selcuk Koran1 & Elvira Koran2
1Department of English Language Teaching, Faculty of Education, Ishik University Erbil, Iraq
2Department of English Language Teaching, Faculty of Education, Ishik University Erbil, Iraq
Abstract: Effective management is one of the determining factors that play a critical role in teacher motivation. It is also the main factor behind a successful educational institution. Moreover, effective management is necessary to motivate people into action and propel an institution to reach its established objectives. In an educational institution, where managerial structure fails to function well, teachers obviously lose their motivation to teach as well as their commitment to the organization. Therefore, administrators’ leadership styles can affect teacher motivation which will eventually affect learners’ performance. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the administrators’ leadership styles, their awareness of teacher motivation peculiarities and strategies they use to motivate the teaching staff at Ronaki Educational Institutions in Erbil, Iraq. It further aims to investigate what makes an effective administrator. To achieve the research goal, the study firstly uses the theoretical analysis of the scientific and methodological literature on the research problem and makes use of a semi-structured interview with Ronaki Hawler Educational Institutions’ administrators. In the interview with 24 administrators, the information on organizational practices and their frequencies, employed by administrators, was obtained. It included elements such as; whether/how often advancement opportunities, promotion, autonomy, bonuses were granted to the teaching staff, what sort of responsibility they possessed, how their recognition as teachers was expressed, and how secure they felt their jobs were. The findings were analyzed and discussed in the discussion part of this research study.
Keywords: Educational Leadership, Teacher Motivation, Job Satisfaction, Demotivation
Ahmed, Z, Khan, U., I. & Nawaz, A. (2016) Leadership Theories and Styles: A Literature Review. Journal of Resources Development and Management, 16. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293885908_Leadership_Theories_and_Styles_A_Literature_Review
Bradley, P., Schneider, P., DeArmond, M., & Gundlach, L. (2003). Making sense of leading schools: A study of the school principalship. University of Washington, 25-26.
Branch, G., Hanushek, E., & Rivkin, S. (2013). School leaders matter. Education Next, 1, 62-69. Evans, L. (1998). Teacher Morale, Job Satisfaction and Motivation. London: Chapman Paul Publishing Limited.
Eyal, O., & Roth, G. (2010). Principal’s leadership and teacher motivation: Sel-determination Theory analysis. Journal of Administration, 49(3), 256-275.
Ferlazzo, L. (2011) Involvement or Engagement. Educational Leadership, 68(8), 10-14.
Kara, F. S. (2010). Principal leadership and teacher motivation under high stakes accountability policies. Leadership and Policies in Schools, 9(2), 161-189.
Koran, S. (2015a). Analyzing EFL teachers’ initial job motivation and factors effecting their motivation in Fezalar Educational Institutions in Iraq. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1), 72-80.
Koran, S. (2015b). Measuring the degree of english teachers’ motivation. IBSU Journal of Education, 1(1), 55-64.
Korkmaz, M. (2007). The effects of leadership styles on organizational health. Educational Research Quarterly, 30(3), 22-54.
Leithwood K., Mascall B., Straus T., Sacs R., Memon, N., & Yashikina, A. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 37-67.
Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., & Anderson, E. S. (2010). Learning from Leadership: Investigating the Links to Improved Students Learning. Minnesota: Final Report Research to the Wallace Foundation, University of Minnesota and University of Toronto.
Manser, P. (2000). When incentives are intrinsic. NUE Comment, 4(2), 6.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.
McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Nettles, S. M. & Herrington, C. (2007). Revising the importance of the direct effects of school leadership on student achievement: The implications for school improvement policy. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(4), 724-736.
Philip A.Woods (2005)Democratic Leadership in Education.London: Paul Chapman. Robinson, V. M., Lyod, C. A. & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: an analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674.
Sathye, M. (2004, September). Leadership in higher education: a qualitative study. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum:Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 5, No. 3).
Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31-56.
International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies
ISSN 2520-0968 (Online), ISSN 2409-1294 (Print), December 2017, Vol.4, No.3
Copyright © 2014 by Tishk International University, Developed and Designed by RAS Groups and M. Albay (IU Web Office Manager)
replica rolex is among the most international greatest perplexing watch survey of the brand. Put to use fake watches during the world-wide industry is also extremely well known.Customers from all of areas of life really like breitling replica watches. The initial financial investment valuation belongs to the benefits associated with best replica watches.