Authors: Elmir Gurbanov & Almaz Mirzayeva
Authors: Elmir Gurbanov 1 & Almaz Mirzayeva2
1Baku Engineering University, Baku, Azerbaijan
2Baku Engineering University, Baku, Azerbaijan
Abstract: The article discusses the importance of learner autonomy in language classes and proposes some activities contributing to develop more autonomous learning skills in students. The concept is analyzed from various aspects, particularly from responsibility perspective noting the development of learner autonomy as a promoter of more responsibility from students’ side. However, it also draws attention on teachers’ role as a facilitator, declaring that learner autonomy has never meant decline in teachers’ responsibility or withdrawal, but the change in the nature of involvement in classroom activities and assignments. The study asked the opinions of language instructors at a university in Azerbaijan collecting quantitative data and drawing conclusions based on literature review and views of the survey participants.
Keywords: Learner Autonomy, Student-Centered Approach, Students’ Responsibility, Language Classes, Self And Peer-Assessment, Seatwork, Homework, Project Assignment
Goodrich, H. A. (1997). Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership, 54(4), 14-17.
Gurbanov, E. (2016). The challenge of grading in self and peer-assessment (undergraduate students’ and university teachers’ perspectives). Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 1(2), 97-107.
Little, D. (1994). Learner Autonomy: A theoretical construct and its practical applications. Die Neueren Sprachen, 93(5), 430–442.
Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing learner autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71-94.
Patall, E., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 896–915.
Pierson, H. (1996). Learner culture and learner autonomy in Hong Kong Chinese context. In R.
Pemberton, E. Li, W. Or, & H. Pierson, Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning (pp.49-58). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Popescu, A.-V., & Cohen-Vida, M.-I. (2014). Communication strategies for developing the learner’s autonomy. 5th World Conference on Educational Sciences – WCES 2013 (pp. 3489 – 3493). Rome: Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Roche, A., & Clarke, D. (2015). Describing the nature and effect of teacher interactions with students during seat work on challenging tasks. Mathematics Education in the Margins (pp. 532-539). Sunshine Coast: MERGA.
Sakai, S., Takagi, A., & Chu, M. P. (2010). Promoting learner autonomy: Student perceptions of responsibilities in a language classroom in East Asia. Educational Perspectives, 43(1&2), 12-27.
Scott, C., & Glaze, N. (2017). Homework policy and student choice: Findings from a Montessori charter school. Journal of Montessori Research, 3(2), 1-18.
Tamjid, N. H., & Birjandi, P. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy through self and peer-assessment. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(5), 245-251.
Vatterot, C. (2010). Five hallmarks of good homework. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 10-15.
International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies
ISSN 2520-0968 (Online), ISSN 2409-1294 (Print), March 2018, Vol.4, No.5