Neville D’Cunha 1
1International Relations & Diplomacy Department, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Tishk International University, Erbil, Iraq
Abstract: Aim: This article reports on findings from work at Tishk International University-Erbil (TIU) as part of research undertaken to assess the conceptual understanding and critical thinking abilities of undergraduate students through integrated (written and oral) assessment. The research had two purposes: (1) to measure the various elements of students written and oral works; and (2) to use these common elements to address the soft-skills development issues of students and create opportunities for every student to succeed both in assessment and skill development.
Methodology: 4-Year Degree program students take core courses, and their assessment is divided into 40% Formative and 60% Summative. In 2019 Spring Semester 100 students (59% male and 41% female) were included using comprehensive sampling method comprising 4 classes of TIU for the research purpose. The 4 cohorts’ formative (continuous) assessments data of written and oral coursework was collated and compared for measures of academic performance elements and how course activities and assignments promoted students’ soft skills development.
Outcomes: Data sets were analyzed using frequency distribution tables to identify predictive patterns of students’ conceptual understanding and critical thinking skills. The findings indicate a significant difference among students’ skill sets. Students’ scores were Novice 0-65% ≤ (written) w 57% | (oral) o 47%; Beginner 66-75% ≤ w 22% | o 27%; Competent 76-85% ≤ w 14% | o 11%; Proficient 86-100% ≤ w 7% | o 15%. Results indicate that assessing students without knowing the level of student’s personal development had negative affect on students’ performance. There was also a relationship between written and oral assignments scores and students’ levels of personal development with regards to acquisition of soft skills that clearly reflected in their overall formative score.
Significance: Formative assessments are a valuable indicator to identify competencies of students and recognize who is doing well and who is most vulnerable and at risk of failing the course. Results from this study is significant to Course Coordinators in Kurdistan higher education in enabling them to create learning and skilling opportunities for students, so that they succeed both in their education and in real-world.
Keywords: Formative Assessment, Conceptual Understanding, Critical Thinking, Student’s Personal Development
Published: September 14, 2021
Ainsworth, L., & Viegut, D. (2006). Common formative assessments: How to connect standards-based instruction and assessment. California: Corwin Press.
Clarke, S. (2012) Active learning through formative assessment. London: Houghton Education.
Cushner, K., McClelland, A., & Safford, P. (2000). Human diversity in education: An integrative approach. (3rd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Davis, S. F., & Buskist, W. (2002) Teaching psychology. New Jersey & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gross, P. A. (1997). Joint curriculum design. New Jersey & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Killen, R. (2009). Effective teaching strategies. (5th Ed.). Sydney: CENAGAGE Learning.
McNaught, K., & Benson, S. (2015). Increasing student performance by changing the assessment practice within an academic writing unit in an Enabling Program. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 6 (1), 73-87.
Pollard, A. (Ed.). (2002). Readings for reflective teaching. London & New York: Continuum.
Wharton, S. (2013). Written feedback as interaction: Knowledge exchange or activity exchange? The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 4 (1), 9-20.
Zare, P., & Othman, M. (2015). Students’ perceptions toward using classroom debate to develop critical thinking and oral communication ability. Asian Social Science Journal, 11 (9), 158 – 170.
Zare, P., & Othman, M. (2013). Classroom debate as a systematic teaching/learning program. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28 (11), 1506 – 1513.
International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies
ISSN 2520-0968 (Online), ISSN 2409-1294 (Print), September 2021, Vol.8, No.3