Authors: David Kiprono Lelei Rutto1 & Hillary Sialo2 & Audrey Matere3
1Faculty of Education and Human Resources, Kisii University, Kisii, Kenya
2Faculty of Education and Human Resources, Kisii University, Kisii, Kenya
3Faculty of Education and Human Resources, Kisii University, Kisii, Kenya
Abstract: Most secondary school secretaries do management of school offices. The routine work include, arranging meeting schedules for the principal and managing school correspondences within the secondary schools. All this calls for efficiency and effectiveness in performance and to achieve so, one of the fundamental processes for almost all activities is communication. During duty performance, technologies, trainings, and appropriate communication gadgets increase the efficiency of performance of not only secondary schools staff, but achievement of school mission and plans. The objective was to establish factors that affect secondary schools secretarial staff communication ability and efficiency. The study specifically looked at how technology, school structure and channels of communication affect secretarial staff. The target population was 50 respondents and sample size of 30 secondary schools secretaries. The study used stratified random sampling and randomly picked one secretary per school by survey questionnaire. Results showed that secretarial staffs were all female, majority of them (71%) were at age between 30-55 years and (77%) of them had 6-17 years experience. Training showed that (60%) were at least college level though most of them (87%) were not trained on communication and over half (57%) of them said school needed more communication technological equipment and training for them. Communication challenges were faced by 74% with only 22% using the communication gadgets, and 80% said there were no communication policies in place. On technology, 54% have 1-3 computers in school. It was concluded that there was need to have the necessary skills and equipment for the secretarial staff to perform effectively and efficiently. It was recommended that schools buy communication technology equipment, train secretaries on them, have flexible secondary schools structure to stimulate faster flow of information and develop communication policies to guide the staff in their work.
Keywords: Secretary, School, Communication, Ability, Efficiency
Agomuo, E. E. (2005). Modern Office Technology: Issues, Procedures and Practice. Nsukka, Nigeria: University of Nigeria Press Ltd.
Akinyemi A.O. (2001). The Impact of Office Technology on Information Processing and Its Implications for Secretarial Training in the 21st Century in Nigeria. Bus. Edu. J. 111. (4), 75-79.
Akpomi, M., & Ordu, P. (2009).Modern office technology and the secretary’s productivity in private business organizations. African Journal of Business Management, 3 (8), 333.
Akpomi, M.E. (2003). Effects of Modern Office Technology as Perceived by Secretaries. Bus. Edu. J. 4 (1), 147-155.
Anyakoha E.U. (2002). Welcome address at the 3rd National conference of HERAN held at Princess Alexandra Unity Hall, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. 14 – 17 September.
Armah, E. D. A. (2015).The Impact of Office Information and Communication Technology on the Performance of the Professional Secretary at the Ghana Ports and Harbors Authority, Takoradi. International Journal in Management and Social Science 3(1), 365-373.
Buseni, J. (2013). Effects of Information and Communication Technology on Secretaries’ Performance in Contemporary Organizations in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Information and Knowledge Management Journal, 3 (5), 87-93.
Duniya, A. P. (2011). Electronic office skills required by secretaries in Polytechnics in Kogi State. Business Education Journal, 8(1), 169.
Eze, F.O. (2000). Modern Office Information Technology: Effective Secretarial and Office Management. Enugu State Local Government Commission.
Ezewu E.E. (2006). The Effects of Organizational Structure on Staffing, Communicating and Performing: A Case Analysis of an Educational Organization. School Leadership and Management, 4(3).
Graham H.T., & Roger, B. (1998). Human Resource Management. Harlow Essex England.
Heracleous, L., & Barrett, M. (2001). Organizational Change and Discourse: Communicative Actions and Deep Structure s in the Context of Information Technology Implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (4), 755-78.
Leavitt, H. J. (2005). Top down: Why Hierarchies are Here to Stay and How to Manage them More Effectively. 1st edition, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Lewis, T.M. (2011). Organizational structure effect on communication efficiency for management information system supported organizations: A Delphi Study, ProQuest Dissertation and Theses.
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. O. (2008). Educational Administration: Concepts and Practices. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage.
Nonye, A. (2013). Capacity Building in Modern Office Technology: An Imperative for Effective Secretarial Productivity. Asian Journal of Business Management 5(2), 193-196.
Nwanewezi, M. C., & Akpomi, M. E. (2009). Confidential secretaries and information and communication technology (ICT) skill competency. International Journal of Communication and Performing Arts, 1(1), 72-77.
Nwaokwa, E., & Okoli, B. E. (2012). Information of Communication Technology on the Influence Performance of Secretaries in Government Ministries in Nasarawa State, North-Central Nigeria. Research Journal of Information Technology, 4(3), 93-97.
Nwosu, B. O. (2001). Word processing and electronic office operations competencies currently needed by secretaries in selected business offices in Abia and Imo States. In: National Conference Held at the Federal Polytechnic, Idah, Kogi State, and 27th November -1st December.
Owiro, O. (1999). Management Skills for School Heads. Nairobi: World Link.
Porras J. I., & Robertson P. J. (1992). Organizational development: theory, practice, research. In: M. D.
Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 719-822). Palo Alto, CA: Psychology-Press.
Saleemi N.A. (2008). Principles and practice of Management. Saleemi publications.
Teixeria R., Koufteros X., & Peng X.D. (2012). Organizational Structure, Integration and Manufacturing Performance: A Conceptual Model and Propositions. Journal of Operation and Supply Chain Management, 5(1).
Wright, P.M., & Noe, R.A., (1995). Management of Organizations. Chicago, IL: Irwin. USA.
International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies
ISSN 2520-0968 (Online), ISSN 2409-1294 (Print), March 2017, Vol.3, No.3