Author: Hamdi Serin1
1Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Ishik University, Faculty of education, Erbil, Iraq
Abstract: Student-centered instruction in the classroom has recently challenged teacher-centeredness for allowing students to construct their understandings using their experiences and actions. Student-centered pedagogy is based on constructivist and democratic principles. That students make sense of what they learn in a classroom environment in which they are stimulated to develop their reflective and critical thinking and sense of responsibility come to the fore in student-centered pedagogy. Teacher-centered instruction on the other hand relied heavily on the behaviorist theory which was based on the idea that behavior changes are caused by external stimuli. Compared with student-centered classroom, students in teacher-centered classroom are passive and respond to environmental stimuli. Teacher has the ultimate authority and is in charge of learning for that reason students do not have adequate opportunities to develop their critical thinking and problem solving skills. This article endeavors to compare student-centered and teachercentered approaches and documents their general features in the classroom.
Keywords: Teacher-Centeredness, Student-Centeredness, Classroom Instruction, Skills Development
Brophy, J. (1999). Perspectives of classroom management: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In H. Freiberg (Ed.), Beyond behaviorism: Changing the classroom management paradigm, 43–56. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Collins, J. W., 3rd, & O’Brien, N. P. (Eds.). (2003). Greenwood dictionary of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Condelli, L., & Wrigley, H. S. (2009). What works for adult literacy students of English as a second language? In S. Reder & J. Bynner (Eds.), Tracking adult literacy numeracy skills: Findings from longitudinal research. New York and London: Routledge. 13-19
Dewey, J. (1997). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.
DeVries, R., & B. Zan. (1994). Moral classroom, moral children: Creating a constructivist atmosphere in early education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Espenshade, T. J. & Radford, A. W. (2009). No longer separate, not yet equal: Race and class in elite college admission and campus life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p.12-20
Freiberg, H. J. (Ed.). (1999). Beyond behaviorism: Changing the classroom management paradigm. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Goodlad, J. I. (2004). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mart, C.T. (2013). A passionate teacher: Teacher commitment and dedication to student learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(1), 437-442.
Mart, C.T. (2013). Commitment to school and students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(1), 336-340.
Mascolo, M. (2009). Beyond student-centered and teacher-centered pedagogy: Teaching and learning as guided participation. Pedagogy and the Human Sciences, 1(1), 3-27.
Mascolo, M. F., Fischer, K. W., & Pollack, R. (1997). Keeping the constructor in constructivism: An epigenetic systems approach. In Mascolo, M. F. & Pollack, R. (Eds.) Frontiers of Constructivism: Problems and Prospects, Special Issue of Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 10, 25-29.
Peyton, J. K., More, S. K., & Young, S. (2010). Evidence-based, Student choice instructional practices. Center for Applied Linguistic. 20-25. Retrieved from http://cal.org/caelanetwork
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behavioralism. Random House, New York.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard.
International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies
ISSN 2520-0968 (Online), ISSN 2409-1294 (Print), September 2018, Vol.5, No.1